Case Studies: Meetings
Friday, January 24, 2003, Torgersen 3180 (1:30-3:30 pm)
- Next Meeting: Friday, January 31, Torgersen 3180 (1:30 pm)
- Attendees: Mary Beth, Jack, Con, Beth, Jonathan
- We looked over the results of the homework #1 survey
- We discussed messiness and realism in a case study
- Claim: Messiness in a case
- + Supports realism
- - But does not give the same experience unless there is a story to link the artifacts
- Perhaps a case should have connective threading that links the artifacts together in the same manner they were generated and experienced. There should be a way for a case user to backtrack or follow this thread starting from any artifact of the case.
- We discussed case-based learning vs. example-based learning
- We need to look at other known case-based learning situations (such as professional schools) to examine:
- IF they use cases as a basis for any introductory courses
- Whether cases are used at all or only some levels of learning [Action: ALL]
- Cases contain examples in a context
- What other paradigms of learning? (such as principle first)
- Are we doing true case-based learning or are we doing example-based learing based on realistic examples in cases?
- Possible survey question: Did you explore cases beyond the current homework requirement? What did you get from that experience?
- Thinking ahead to this summer...
- There will potentially be a large diversity in teaching objectives for the participants
- We will need to get them to articulate these objectives before any workshop
- So they have them defined
- So we can assess the range of diversity
- So we can support the various approaches
- We will need to get examples of their course materials
- Can we analyze the link-throughs to the UCC to see if there are any potential web sites out there supporting classes based on the UCC? [Action: Con]
- We generated two additional self-efficacy questions for homework #2 survey:
- Even though I have only studied examples of metaphores, I could generate metaphores useful for activity design.
- I could use a conceptual metaphore to clarify design requirements, even though some parts of the metaphore are irrelevant.
|